CO129-535-4 N.I. Brewer- petition for pardon 28-5-1931 - 24-10-1931 — Page 39

42

Borewer

nominal capital

maintains that the possession o

mas

disadvantage

Large

and not

in

advantage to

1.

Влий

4

.35.

In 15.

what

is

но

Sonnt

Kat

Brewer

acted

proof 1024

malâ pide.

ind

Makle

fide

d

Bo JJ: Brewer

wan kat me

Thought the

entries

in the Report

rrenc

correct

:

p..

(kdy, the account aut

Im

<

defence says,

Rovs, the

блеро sugo, with

Ꭺ

milk out qualification, Kat it was

accountant

was corent.

qualification, that

correct:

/

or the porsecution,

ir

There is

wid unce

contradicting

existence

I such

LA

sinie

یخ

mind

Brewer

By for the

7). The listory of the

기

Shares

Instone Trading Co. is irrelevant;

affermando ncquired

moment

J

a

elotment is the

ercial

moment to law

considered mi

innichon

Y

The question whether and not the

allotment was for cash, and the decisions

regarding the

Mühen

t

我

Boever d

AL Ke

But ke

a

alloimeni q- Kesi

Siases wa

Directors' meeting

which

wi attend (Document (q) in file 2.).

allotment Rese seaves sivod

other snares, incept

moment

д

Fortnig

Jame

sromisons promise is guarantee

guarantee

não

fortified

allurgh

Kay jrom the Dimcions

umen, orizable, Bien is

Dis indemnity may s= we held responsinis, because me the directors' meeting.

B. en is commo

mix uri aitend

ރ